| Course Unit Title | Course Unit Code | Type of Course Unit | Level of Course Unit | Year of Study | Semester | ECTS Credits |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparative Islamic Law | ILH326 | Elective | Bachelor's degree | 3 | Spring | 5 |
Name of Lecturer(s)
Associate Prof. Dr. Hüseyin OKUR
Learning Outcomes of the Course Unit
1) To recognize the formation of Islamic law schools and their institutional structures during the historical period
2) To know the literature of Islamic law schools
3) To acquire information on the methodologies of the Islamic law schools
4) To analyse styles of approach of Islamic law schools to legal issues
5) To explain the cultural, geographical, climatic and social causes leading to the differentiation of Islamic law schools
6) To explain the differences between Islamic law and the other legal systems like Roman law in terms of their perspectives on legal issues
7) To explain the differences between Islamic law and the other legal systems like Roman law in terms of their methodologies
8) To compare Islamic law and the other legal systems in terms of the origin of law and its function
9) To acquire information about the civilization perception of Islamic law school in terms of the formation of Islamic civilization
10) To understand the principles of Islamic law school in terms of social cohesion and social order
Program Competencies-Learning Outcomes Relation
| Program Competencies | ||||||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | ||
| Learning Outcomes | ||||||||||||
| 1 | High | Middle | Middle | High | High | High | Middle | Middle | High | High | Low | |
| 2 | High | Middle | Middle | High | Middle | High | Middle | High | High | Middle | High | |
| 3 | Middle | High | High | Middle | Middle | Low | High | Middle | Middle | High | High | |
| 4 | Middle | High | High | Middle | High | High | Middle | High | High | High | Middle | |
| 5 | Middle | High | High | Middle | Middle | High | High | Middle | High | Middle | High | |
| 6 | High | Middle | High | High | Middle | High | High | Middle | High | High | Middle | |
| 7 | High | High | Middle | High | High | High | Middle | Middle | Low | Middle | High | |
| 8 | High | Middle | High | Middle | High | High | Middle | Middle | High | Middle | High | |
| 9 | High | Middle | High | Middle | High | Middle | Middle | High | Middle | Low | High | |
| 10 | High | High | High | High | High | Middle | Middle | High | Middle | Low | Middle | |
Mode of Delivery
Face to Face
Prerequisites and Co-Requisites
None
Recommended Optional Programme Components
None
Course Contents
Fuqaha reasons for the conflict, comparing the views of sects and denominations of the output sample revealed.
Weekly Schedule
1) The reasons for dispute of fuqaha2) The emergence processes of Islamic law schools
3) Literature on comparative law
4) Salat (the worship of prayer) in comparative law
5) Zakah (charity) in comparative law
6) Savm (fasting) and hajj (pilgrimage) in comparative law
7) Election methods and procedures in comparative law
8) Midterm exam
9) Forms of state and government in comparative law
10) Civil liability in comparative law
11) Criminal liability in comparative law
12) Judging procedures and methods in comparative law
13) Means of evidence in comparative law
14) Limitation in comparative law
15) International agreement in comparative law
16) Final exam
Recommended or Required Reading
1- 1- Hayrettin Karaman, Mukayeseli İslam Hukuku I-III, İstanbul 2003. 2- Vehbe
Zuhaylî, İslam Fıkhı Ansiklopedisi, İstanbul 1994. 3- Ferhat Koca, Mukayeseli
İslam Hukuk Düşüncesinin Temellendirilmesi, Ankara 2002. 4- Ebû Cafer
Muhammed b. Cerîr et-Taberî, İhtilaâfu’l-Fukahâ Beyrut ty. 5- İbn Rüşd,
Bidayetü’l-müctehid ve nihayetü’l-muktesid (mezhepler arası mukayeseli İslam
hukuku), (Tercüme Ahmed Meylani ; redaksiyon, hadis tahrici ve düzenleme Vecdi
Akyüz), Ensar Neşriyat, İstanbul, 2015.
Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods
1) Lecture
2) Question-Answer
3) Discussion
4) Drill and Practice
5) Group Study
6) Brain Storming
7) Case Study
8) Self Study
9) Problem Solving
Assessment Methods and Criteria
Contribution of Midterm Examination to Course Grade |
40% |
|---|---|
Contribution of Final Examination to Course Grade |
60% |
Total |
100% |
Language of Instruction
Turkish
Work Placement(s)
Not Required