>
Course Unit Title | Course Unit Code | Type of Course Unit | Level of Course Unit | Year of Study | Semester | ECTS Credits |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Architectural Environment Analysis | MIM259 | Elective | Bachelor's degree | 2 | Fall | 4 |
Associate Prof. Dr. Deniz GERÇEK KURT
Assistant Prof. Dr. (DOÇ. DR) BÜLENT DOĞAN
Lecturer Esra ERES YALÇIN
1) Recognize “Architectural environment” as the final reflection and end production of economic, social, cultural, ecological and legal “environment” determined by the production relations
1) Recognize “Architectural environment” as the final reflection and end production of economic, social, cultural, ecological and legal “environment” determined by the production relations
2) Recognize different evolution processes of architectural environment in different geographic regions based on production relations
2) Recognize different evolution processes of architectural environment in different geographic regions based on production relations
3) Explain the reasons for different evolution processes of physical space organization in different geographic regions
3) Explain the reasons for different evolution processes of physical space organization in different geographic regions
4) Recognize architectural environment examples in Turkey and the World.
4) Recognize architectural environment examples in Turkey and the World.
5) Do analysis of architectural environment on the basis of need, technique, technology and materials.
5) Do analysis of architectural environment on the basis of need, technique, technology and materials.
Program Competencies | |||||||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ||
Learning Outcomes | |||||||||||
1 | No relation | No relation | No relation | No relation | No relation | No relation | No relation | No relation | No relation | No relation | |
1 | High | Middle | High | High | Middle | High | High | High | Middle | High | |
2 | No relation | No relation | No relation | No relation | No relation | No relation | No relation | No relation | No relation | No relation | |
2 | High | Middle | High | High | Middle | High | High | High | Middle | High | |
3 | No relation | No relation | No relation | No relation | No relation | No relation | No relation | No relation | No relation | No relation | |
3 | High | High | High | High | High | High | High | High | Middle | High | |
4 | No relation | No relation | No relation | No relation | No relation | No relation | No relation | No relation | No relation | No relation | |
4 | High | Middle | High | High | Middle | High | High | High | Middle | High | |
5 | No relation | No relation | No relation | No relation | No relation | No relation | No relation | No relation | No relation | No relation | |
5 | High | High | High | High | High | High | High | High | Middle | High |
Face to Face
None
No
To try finding answers to the following questions by using aesthetics, architectural psychology, environmental psychology and innovative design disciplines as architectural environment analytical tools: How can the building or building groups get the occupants’ attention?What is the architecture’s impact on occupants’ real-time experiences?Is this architectural environment coherent?Does this architectural environment evoke exploration interest?Do the occupants enjoy the variety and complexity of the design?Do the design promote for occupant discovery?Can occupants manage to escape from stress in this environment?Does the design promote healthy social interactions?Is there a sense of community fostered in this design?
Turkish
Not Required